This is probably a stupid question/idea but... Hair strand tests are like a timeline showing what has been put in your body and how long ago. In cases like this couldn't a hair strand test prove or disprove a fighters claim of innocence? It would show how much of a drug was used as well as how often so if it's there on a regular basis it's likely that the fighter is knowingly taking peds. If it shows up only during the time of the failed urine/blood test then they would have a leg to stand on as far as being slipped something ( I think Jones is throwing this out there). I'm sure I'm over simplifying it but the idea came to me and I figured I'd ask.